| Message |
HKS>B&B for power. And the ONLY dyno comparing the 2 shows a 13hp difference, not a 2hp difference(where did you get that number??)You act as if the HKS is some low quality piece that rusts out in a year. If you want longevity that bad, OK.
Since the ONLY dyno has shown 13hp + for the HKS @500hp --> I don't care about people's 'opinions' on what power the B&B has compared top the HKS(sheep-->flock). it's still just opinion until they're dynoed(they have been). THat's funny that you think the HKS is some worthless POS that just happens to be designed better for performance, is cheaper, and has dynoed more. If you like the 'look' and 'sound' of the B&B that's fine, but quit trying to make it sound like the HKS is some Lead pipe that falls apart and rusts out the first time you drive in the rain... that's just ridiculous that you argue because you exhaust will last 20 years when mine ONLY lasts 15 then that makes your exhaust better. Gimme a break. According to the judgements and points of comparison you've made the NA > TT, just because it's more likely to last longer, with which I tend to disagree
"You've got a bad turbo"- expert diagnosis by Brice at Alamo Autosports** cactuses
|
 |
